Our Florida Whistleblower Lawyer Team Helps Report Defense Contractor Fraud, Health Care Fraud and Securities Fraud. We Maximize Your Cash Award.
MahanyLaw, founded by whistleblower author and U.S. fraud recovery attorney Brian Mahany, represents those with inside information on Florida Medicaid and Medicare fraud, pharma fraud, defense contract fraud and securities fraud and works to maximize cash whistleblower awards.
MahanyLaw holds the record for the largest whistleblower settlement in history – $16.65 billion. Our focus is on protecting the privacy and rights of the individuals we represent, no matter how large the case.
We work with Florida whistleblowers from across the state, including Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Hillsborough, Orange, Pinellas, Duval, Lee, Polk and Brevard counties. If you have inside information about fraud against a government-funded program, call us.
Florida Whistleblowers Could Be Entitled to a Large Cash Reward
The federal government, State of Florida and Florida cities and counties lose billions of dollars each year to fraud and waste. In fact, Florida has the dubious distinction of being the healthcare fraud capital of the United States. To combat this fraud, both Congress and the Florida Legislature has enacted programs that pay large financial incentives to private citizens with inside information about corporate greed, fraud and abuse.
Hundreds of Floridians report fraud each year by writing a letter or calling a government hotline. Unfortunately, there are no rewards for those who report this way. The best way to stop fraud and the only way of earning a cash reward involves following strict procedures. More on that below.
Florida bankers, engineers, pharmacists, nurses, mechanics, accountants, EMT’s, physicians, executives and other professionals have exclusive access to incidents of corporate wrongdoing. If you have inside or “original source” information about fraud, you may be eligible for a cash whistleblower reward.
Under Federal and Florida State False Claims Acts, a whistleblower whose inside information helps the government recover funds is entitled to collect between 10% and 30% of the total government recovery.
The government pays whistleblower cash awards ranging in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars for information about fraud against the U.S. government, including:
- Florida Medicaid or Medicare Fraud
- Government Contract Violations
- Bank or Financial Fraud
- Corrupt Pharmaceutical/Medical Device Schemes
- Securities (SEC) Violations
- Improper Tax Reporting / Tax Evasion (IRS Whistleblower Program)
- Other Corporate Misconduct
MahanyLaw has strong credibility with the Department of Justice, IRS, SEC and other regulatory agencies that handle whistleblower fraud report and reward cases. Our whistleblower lawyers participated in over $10 billion in recoveries since 2014 alone with $100 million in whistleblower rewards.
To learn whether your information qualifies you for a cash whistleblower award in a free, fully-confidential case evaluation, Call the Florida whistleblower lawyer team at MahanyLaw now: 202.800.9791 or Report Online.
Report Florida Defense Contractor Fraud And Claim Your Cash Award
The U.S. Department of Defense spends billions of dollars per year on contracts for goods and services, military ships, aircraft, weapons systems, information technology, cybersecurity, military base support and consulting services. In 2018, Florida received over $44 billion in direct defense spending. With over 60,000 active duty military personnel and 30,000 civilians and 73,000 defense contractor workers, Florida is in the top five states for military spending.
Florida defense contractors include:
- Harris Corp.
- BAE Systems
- Advanced C4 Solutions, Inc.
- BB&G Enterprises, Inc.
- Lockheed Martin
- American Contractor & Technology, Inc.
- Computer Sciences Raytheon
- ITT Corporation
- Adacel Systems Inc
- Advantor Systems Corp.
- Applied Visual Technology, Inc.
- DRS Tactical Systems, Inc.
Government defense contracts contain specific rules and regulations that the government uses to ensure funds are spent properly. When Florida defense contractors fail to comply, they may violate the federal False Claims Act. Florida defense contractor misconduct that violates the federal False Claims Act includes:
- Cost or charge inflation
- Cross charging from fixed-price to cost-plus defense contracts
- Cybersecurity violations
- Violations of Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA)
- Substandard or worthless products or services
- Shifting costs from foreign or private contracts to U.S. defense contracts
- Improper product substitution
- Use of mislabeled or foreign source goods (Buy America violations)
- Failure to report non-compliance
Florida based defense contractor Kaman Precision Products paid $4.75 million to settle claims that it provided defective fuzes in “bunkerbuster” bombs. The case was brought under the federal whistleblower statute, the False Claims Act.
Do you suspect your Florida defense contractor employer may be guilty of False Claims Act violations?
Florida defense contractor fraud recovery lawyer Brian Mahany and the MahanyLaw Tampa and Miami area teams work to protect your privacy and rights as a Florida whistleblower and maximize your cash award.
Cash Whistleblower Awards For Reporting Florida Health Care Fraud
Florida holds the dubious distinction of having the highest rate of Medicare fraud in the United States. Taxpayers pay billions of dollars in taxes each year, some of it going to crooks who deliberately rip off Medicare, Florida Medicaid and private health insurance companies.
One of the largest Medicare fraud cases in the United States took place in Florida. In 2019, a jury convicted Philip Esformes of 20 counts of healthcare fraud and related crimes. Prosecutors say Esformes’ scheme totaled one billion dollars. Miami’s United States Attorney said, “Philip Esformes orchestrated one of the largest health care fraud schemes in U.S. history, defrauding Medicare and Medicaid to the tune of over a billion dollars.” [Update: Two days before Christmas 2020, President Donald Trump commuted Esformes’ 20 year prison sentence.]
Health care employees are often the first to identify Medicaid and Medicare fraud and are invaluable in bringing violations to light. The False Claims Act provides cash incentives for doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, billing clerks and other health care professionals who are the first to report fraud.
Common examples of Medicare and Florida Medicaid fraud include:
Billing higher rates for Medicare beneficiaries
- Billing for services not provided
- Billing for medically unnecessary services
- Misrepresenting costs or prices
- Insufficient medical documentation
- Off-label marketing of medical devices or pharmaceuticals
- Treatment by unlicensed or unqualified providers
- Offering or accepting kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals
- Double-billing, upcoding or unbundling procedure charges
As an added bonus, Florida has its own state whistleblower reward statute (Florida False Claims Act) that pays rewards in Florida Medicaid fraud and other cases where the state is a victim of fraud. That means it is possible to collect two rewards in certain instances such as Medicaid. (Both the state and federal government fund Medicaid.)
Our MahanyLaw whistleblower attorneys represent clients working with health care facilities across the state of Florida, including Broward health, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, UF Health Shands Hospital, Tampa General Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Florida and HCA Healthcare*.
*HCA, the owner of over 100 hospitals that was once run by ex-Florida Governor Rick Scott, paid a $1.7 billion fine for Medicare fraud.
If you have inside information on Medicare or Florida Medicaid fraud, contact the Florida Whistleblower Lawyer Team at Mahany Law for a no-fee absolutely confidential consultation: 202.800.9791 or Report Online
We Maximize Cash Awards For Florida Securities Fraud Whistleblowers
Florida whistleblowers who bring original source information that leads to a successful SEC action are eligible to receive 10-30% of the recovered penalties, fines and damages when damages exceed $1 million. Since the 2010 enactment of the SEC Whistleblower Program, whistleblowers have collected more than $100 million in awards.
Common examples of Florida securities fraud include:
- Failure to diversify
- Unauthorized trading
- Omissions and misrepresentation
- Failure to supervise
If you have knowledge of a securities violation, the MahanyLaw SEC whistleblower team will help protect your privacy and rights as a securities whistleblower.
We represent advisers, broker dealer employees and financial professionals working in securities brokerage firms across the state of Florida, including Publix, G4S Secure Solutions, VITAS Healthcare, GWN Securities, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Newport Group Securities, Inc.
We have a full time presence in Florida and serve local clients in all state and federal courts in Florida.
Florida IRS Whistleblower Rewards
Although the False Claims Act and SEC Whistleblower Program are the biggest whistleblower reward programs, the IRS pays out millions of dollars in rewards annually as well.
Reporting information about taxpayers and businesses located in Florida or doing business here that either fail to properly report taxes or willfully fail to pay what they owe can earn you a reward.
The Mahany Law Florida Whistleblower Lawyer Team
Although headquartered in Milwaukee, the Mahany Law has a full time presence in Tampa, Florida. We understand how many whistleblowers come to us from the Sunshine State and have hired a veteran litigator to head our Florida whistleblower efforts. In addition, founder Brian Mahany is a prior resident of Pinellas County, Florida.
If you are concerned about corporate greed, fraudulent billing or regulatory violations or if you have been the victim of retaliation for speaking out, contact your Florida Whistleblower Lawyer Team today.
Act Now! Whistleblower Claims Subject To Time Limits
Whistleblowers must file claims according to relevant statutes of limitations and first-to-file bars. Don’t forfeit your chance to collect your cash award. MahanyLaw’s unique process for maximizing whistleblower claims can ensure your claim is right from the very start. Let us explain how our proven process can work for you.
FLORIDA FALSE CLAIMS ACT
[Editorial comments in italics]
68.081 Florida False Claims Act; short title.
Sections 68.081-68.092 may be cited as the “Florida False Claims Act.”
68.082 False claims against the state; definitions; liability.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Claim” means any request or demand, whether under a contract or otherwise, for money or property, regardless of whether the state has title to the money or property, that:
1. Is presented to any employee, officer, or agent of the state; or
2. Is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the state provides or has provided any portion of the money or property requested or demanded, or if the state will reimburse the contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion of the money or property that is requested or demanded.
(b) “Department” means the Department of Legal Affairs, except as specifically provided in ss. 68.083 and 68.084.
(c) “Knowing” or “knowingly” means, with respect to information, that a person:
1. Has actual knowledge of the information;
2. Acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or
3. Acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information.
No proof of specific intent to defraud is required. Innocent mistake shall be a defense to an action under this act.
[Innocent mistakes would not count as a violation under Florida’s antifraud whistleblower law but there is also need to prove a specific intent to defraud. If a company knows it is in violation and continues to act that way or engages in what courts call “willful blindness,” the state can proceed under the False Claims Act.]
(d) “Material” means having a natural tendency to influence, or be capable of influencing, the payment or receipt of money or property.
(e) “Obligation” means an established duty, fixed or otherwise, arising from an express or implied contractual, grantor-grantee, or licensor-licensee relationship, from a fee-based or similar relationship, from statute or regulation, or from the retention of any overpayment.
(f) “State” means the government of the state or any department, division, bureau, commission, regional planning agency, board, district, authority, agency, or other instrumentality of the state.
[Another important provision of the law. For state whistleblower rewards, the law is not limited to the state itself. Fraud against an instrumentality of the state would also count. An example is the North Broward Hospital District. Some cities like Miami – Dade have their own whistleblower reward and anti-retaliation ordinances that can provide even more benefits and protections.]
(2) Any person who:
(a) Knowingly presents or causes to be presented a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;
(b) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim;
(c) Conspires to commit a violation of this subsection;
(d) Has possession, custody, or control of property or money used or to be used by the state and knowingly delivers or causes to be delivered less than all of that money or property;
(e) Is authorized to make or deliver a document certifying receipt of property used or to be used by the state and, intending to defraud the state, makes or delivers the receipt without knowing that the information on the receipt is true;
(f) Knowingly buys or receives, as a pledge of an obligation or a debt, public property from an officer or employee of the state who may not sell or pledge the property; or
(g) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the state, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the state is liable to the state for a civil penalty of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 and for treble the amount of damages the state sustains because of the act of that person.
(3) The court may reduce the treble damages authorized under subsection (2) if the court finds one or more of the following specific extenuating circumstances:
(a) The person committing the violation furnished the department with all information known to the person about the violation within 30 days after the date on which the person first obtained the information;
(b) The person fully cooperated with any official investigation of the violation; or
(c) At the time the person furnished the department with the information about the violation, no criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative action had commenced under this section with respect to the violation, and the person did not have actual knowledge of the existence of an investigation into the violation;
in which case the court shall award no less than 2 times the amount of damages sustained by the state because of the act of the person. The court shall set forth in a written order its findings and basis for reducing the treble damages award.
[Several observations… First, the Florida whistleblower law authorizes both triple damages and high fines between $5,500 and $11,000 per violation. Each fraudulent invoice or bill is a separation violation. That means a clinic that submits 100 bills for patient services could be liable for fines between $550,000 and $1.1 million.
The court can reduce fines if the wrongdoer fully cooperates or self reports the violation. We always recommend that whistleblowers file right away before the company self reports. Sometimes companies that hear rumors of planned whistleblower complaint will self report in order to save money and preventing the whistleblower from obtaining a reward.]
68.083 Civil actions for false claims.
(1) The department may diligently investigate a violation under s. 68.082. If the department finds that a person has violated or is violating s. 68.082, the department may bring a civil action under the Florida False Claims Act against the person. The Department of Financial Services may bring a civil action under this section if the action arises from an investigation by that department and the Department of Legal Affairs has not filed an action under this act.
(2) A person may bring a civil action for a violation of s. 68.082 for the person and for the affected agency. Civil actions instituted under this act shall be governed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and shall be brought in the name of the State of Florida. Prior to the court unsealing the complaint under subsection (3), the action may be voluntarily dismissed by the person bringing the action only if the department gives written consent to the dismissal and its reasons for such consent.
[Private citizens can file qui tam complaints but you must have a lawyer to do so. The only way to receive a reward is by filing a formal complaint in court. The Florida whistleblower lawyer team at Mahany Law has decades of experience pursuing wrongdoers and obtaining cash rewards for our whistleblower cleints.]
(3) The complaint shall be identified on its face as a qui tam action and shall be filed in the circuit court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Leon County. Immediately upon the filing of the complaint, a copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the Attorney General, as head of the department, and on the Chief Financial Officer, as head of the Department of Financial Services, by registered mail, return receipt requested. The department, or the Department of Financial Services under the circumstances specified in subsection (4), may elect to intervene and proceed with the action, on behalf of the state, within 60 days after it receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information.
[Qui tam complaints are filed under seal meaning they are secret. While under seal you legally cannot discuss the complaint with anyone except your lawyer and government officials.]
(4) If a person brings an action under subsection (2) and the action is based upon the facts underlying a pending investigation by the Department of Financial Services, the Department of Financial Services, instead of the department, may take over the action on behalf of the state. In order to take over the action, the Department of Financial Services must give the department written notification within 20 days after the action is filed that the Department of Financial Services is conducting an investigation of the facts of the action and that the Department of Financial Services, instead of the department, will take over the action filed under subsection (2). If the Department of Financial Services takes over the action under this subsection, the word “department” as used in this act means the Department of Financial Services, and that department, for purposes of that action, shall have all rights and standing granted the department under this act.
(5) The department may, for good cause shown, request the court to extend the time during which the complaint remains under seal under subsection (2). Any such motion may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera. The defendant is not required to respond to any complaint filed under this section until 20 days after the complaint is unsealed and served upon the defendant in accordance with law.
(6) Before the expiration of the 60-day period or any extensions obtained under subsection (5), the department shall:
(a) Proceed with the action, in which case the action is conducted by the department on behalf of the state; or
(b) Notify the court that it declines to take over the action, in which case the person bringing the action has the right to conduct the action.
(7) When a person files an action under this section, no person other than the department may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action.
(8)(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the complaint and information held by the department pursuant to an investigation of a violation of s. 68.082 is confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. This paragraph is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2018, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature.
(b) Information made confidential and exempt under paragraph (a) may be disclosed by the department to a law enforcement agency or another administrative agency in the performance of its official duties and responsibilities.
(c) Information made confidential and exempt under paragraph (a) is no longer confidential and exempt once the investigation is completed, unless the information is otherwise protected by law.
[Once the state’s investigation is over, the complaint becomes unsealed.]
(d) For purposes of this subsection, an investigation is considered complete:
1. Under subsection (1) once the department either files its own action or closes its investigation without filing an action.
2. Under subsection (2) upon the unsealing of the qui tam action or its voluntary dismissal prior to any unsealing.
(1) As used in this section, the term “department” means the Department of Legal Affairs.
(2) Whenever the department has reason to believe that any person may be in possession, custody, or control of any documentary material or may have any information, which documentary material or information is relevant to a civil investigation authorized by s. 68.083, the department may, before the institution of a civil proceeding thereon, issue in writing and cause to be served upon the person a subpoena requiring the person to:
(a) Produce such documentary material for inspection and copying or reproduction;
(b) Answer, under oath and in writing, written interrogatories;
(c) Give sworn oral testimony concerning the documentary material or information; or
(d) Furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony.
(3) The subpoena shall:
(a) Be served upon the person in the manner required for service of process in this state or by certified mail showing receipt by the addressee or by the authorized agent of the addressee.
(b) State the nature of the conduct that constitutes the violation of this act and that is alleged to have occurred or to be imminent.
(c) Describe the class or classes of documentary material to be produced thereunder with such definiteness and certainty as to permit such materials to be reasonably identified.
(d) Prescribe a date and time at which the person must appear to testify, under oath or affirmation, or by which the person must answer written interrogatories or produce the documentary material for inspection or copying; however, such date shall not be earlier than 30 days after the date of service of the subpoena.
(e) Specify a place for the taking of testimony or for the submission of answers to interrogatories and identify the person who is to take custody of any documentary material. Inspection and copying of documentary material shall be carried out at the place where the documentary material is located or at such other place as may be thereafter agreed to by the person and such designated custodian. Upon written agreement between the person and the designated custodian, copies may be substituted for original documents.
(4) Such subpoena may not require the production of any documentary material, the submission of any answers to written interrogatories, or the giving of any oral testimony if such material, answers, or testimony would be protected from disclosure under:
(a) The standards applicable to subpoenas or subpoenas duces tecum issued by a court of this state in aid of a grand jury investigation; or
(b) The standards applicable to a discovery request under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent that the application of such standards to any such subpoena is appropriate and consistent with the provisions and purposes of this act.
(5) This section does not limit the power of the department to require the appearance of witnesses or production of documents or other tangible evidence located outside the state.
(6) Within 30 days after the service of a subpoena upon any person or at any time before the return date specified therein, whichever period is longer, the person served may file, and serve on the department, a petition for an order of the court modifying or setting aside the subpoena. Any such petition shall be filed in the circuit court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County. The time allowed for compliance in whole or in part with the subpoena as deemed proper and ordered by the court shall not run while the petition is pending before the court. The petition shall specify each ground upon which the petitioner relies in seeking relief and may be based upon the failure of the subpoena to comply with this section or upon any constitutional or other legal right or privilege of such person.
(7) In case of the failure of any person to comply in whole or in part with a subpoena and when such person has not filed a petition under subsection (6), the circuit court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, upon application of the department, may issue an order requiring compliance. The failure to obey the order of the court shall be punishable as a contempt of court.
(8) The examination of all witnesses under this section shall be conducted by the department before an officer authorized to administer oaths in this state. The testimony shall be taken stenographically or by a sound-recording device. Any person compelled to appear under a subpoena for oral testimony pursuant to this section may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel. Counsel may advise such person, in confidence, either upon the request of such person or upon counsel’s own initiative, with respect to any question asked of such person. Such person or counsel may object on the record to any question, in whole or in part, and shall briefly state for the record the reason for any such objection. If such person refuses to answer any question, the person conducting the examination may petition the circuit court as provided by subsection (11).
(9) When the testimony is fully transcribed, the person conducting the deposition shall afford the witness, and counsel, if any, a reasonable opportunity to examine the transcript, and the transcript shall be read to or by the witness, unless such examination and reading is waived by the witness. Any changes in form or substance that the witness desires to make shall be entered and identified upon the transcript by the officer or the department, with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for making such changes. The transcript shall then be signed by the witness unless the witness waives the signing in writing, is ill, cannot be found, or refuses to sign. If the transcript is not signed by the witness within 30 days after his or her being afforded a reasonable opportunity to examine it, the person conducting the examination shall sign it and state on the record the fact of the waiver, illness, absence, or refusal to sign, together with the reason, if any, given therefor. Any person required to testify or to submit documentary evidence is entitled, on payment of reasonable costs, to procure a copy of any document produced by such person and of his or her own testimony as stenographically reported or, in the case of a deposition, as reduced to writing by or under the direction of the person taking the deposition.
(10) The department shall have the authority to stipulate to protective orders with respect to documents and information submitted in response to a subpoena under this section.
(11) The department may request that any natural person who refuses to comply with this section on the ground that the testimony or documents may incriminate him or her be ordered by the circuit court to provide the testimony or the documents. Except in a prosecution for perjury, a natural person who complies with a court order to provide testimony or documents after asserting a privilege against self-incrimination to which he or she is entitled by law may not be subject to a criminal proceeding with respect to the transaction to which he or she is required to testify or produce documents. Any natural person who fails to comply with such a court order to testify or produce documents may be adjudged in contempt and imprisoned until the time the person purges himself or herself of the contempt.
(12) While in the possession of the custodian, documentary material, answers to interrogatories, and transcripts of oral testimony shall be available, under such reasonable terms and conditions as the department shall prescribe, for examination by the person who produced such materials or answers or that person’s duly authorized representative.
(13) This section does not impair the authority of the department to:
(a) Institute a civil proceeding under s. 68.083;
(b) Invoke the power of a court to compel the production of evidence before a grand jury; or
(c) Maintain the confidential and exempt status of the complaint and any other information as provided in s. 68.083(8).
(14)(a) A person who knows or has reason to believe that a subpoena pursuant to this section is pending shall not:
1. Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing with the purpose of impairing its verity or availability in such proceeding or investigation; or
2. Make, present, or use any record, document, or thing knowing it to be false.
(b) Any natural person who violates this subsection is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $100,000, reasonable attorney fees, and costs. Any other person who violates this subsection is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $1 million, reasonable attorney fees, and costs.
68.084 Rights of the parties in civil actions.
(1) If the department, on behalf of the state, proceeds with the action, it has the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action, and is not bound by any act of the person bringing the action. The person bringing the action has the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations specified in subsection (2).
(2)(a) The department may at any point voluntarily dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person initiating the action.
(b) Subject to s. 17.04, nothing in this act shall be construed to limit the authority of the department or the qui tam plaintiff to compromise a claim brought in a complaint filed under this act if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances.
[The court can conduct a fairness hearing to ensure any settlement is fair.]
(c) Upon a showing by the department that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would interfere with or unduly delay the department’s prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may, in its discretion, impose limitations on the person’s participation, including, but not limited to:
1. Limiting the number of witnesses the person may call;
2. Limiting the length of the testimony of the person’s witnesses;
3. Limiting the person’s cross-examination of witnesses; or
4. Otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(d) Upon a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person initiating the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
(3) If the department elects not to proceed with the action, the person who initiated the action has the right to conduct the action. If the Attorney General, as head of the department, or the Chief Financial Officer, as head of the Department of Financial Services, so requests, it shall be served with copies of all pleadings and motions filed in the action along with copies of all deposition transcripts at the requesting department’s expense. When a person proceeds with the action, the court, without limiting the rights of the person initiating the action, may nevertheless permit the department to intervene and take over the action on behalf of the state at a later date upon showing of good cause.
[Your own attorney can prosecute the case in the name of the state if the state chooses not to intervene. It is critical to choose a lawyer that has experience litigating these cases. We have seen more than one self-proclaimed Florida whistleblower lawyer who seeks to withdraw the second the state declines to intervene. Any law firm can file a whistleblower complaint. But only a few have the resources and experience to prosecute a case to the end.]
(4) Regardless of whether the department proceeds with the action, upon a showing by the department that certain actions of discovery by the person initiating the action would interfere with an investigation by the state or the prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay such discovery for a period of not more than 60 days. Such a showing shall be conducted in camera. The court may extend the 60-day period upon a further showing in camera by the department that the criminal or civil investigation or proceeding has been pursued with reasonable diligence and any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with an ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceeding.
(5) Notwithstanding paragraph (2)(b), the state may elect to pursue its claim through any available alternate remedy, including any administrative proceeding to determine a civil money penalty. If any such alternate remedy is pursued in another proceeding, the person initiating the action shall have the same rights in such proceeding as the person would have had if the action had continued under this section. Any finding of fact or conclusion of law made in such other proceeding that has become final shall be conclusive on all parties to an action under this section. For purposes of this subsection, a finding or conclusion is final if it has been finally determined on appeal to the appropriate court, if all time for filing such an appeal with respect to the finding or conclusion has expired, or if the finding or conclusion is not subject to judicial review.
[Another important provision. Florida has an alternative remedy provision that says you can still receive a reward even if the state elects to use some other law to pursue the offenders if their prosecution is based on information you provided.]
(6) The Department of Financial Services, or the department, may intervene on its own behalf as a matter of right.
68.085 Awards to plaintiffs bringing action.
[The following section outlines the rewards available for whistleblowers. If the state intervenes and takes over your case, the reward is between 15% and 30% of whatever the state receives from the wrongdoer. Those percentages increase to between 25% and 30% if your own lawyer prosecutes the case. And finally under limited circumstances, the court can reduce those amounts. There is even an attorneys fees provision for successful whistleblowers.]
(1)(a) If the department proceeds with an action brought by a person under this act, subject to the requirements of paragraph (b), the person shall receive at least 15 percent but not more than 25 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(b) If the court finds the action to be based primarily on disclosures of specific information, other than information provided by the person bringing the action, relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing; a legislative, administrative, inspector general, or auditor general report, hearing, audit, or investigation; or from the news media, the court may award such sums as it considers appropriate, but in no case more than 10 percent of the proceeds, taking into account the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation.
(c) Any payment to a person under paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) shall be made from the proceeds. The person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorney fees and costs. All such expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(2) If the department does not proceed with an action under this section, the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive an amount that the court decides is reasonable for collecting the civil penalty and damages. The amount shall be not less than 25 percent and not more than 30 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement and shall be paid out of such proceeds. The person shall also receive an amount for reasonable expenses that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable attorney fees and costs. All such expenses, fees, and costs shall be awarded against the defendant.
(3) Following any distributions under subsection (1) or subsection (2), the state entity injured by the submission of a false or fraudulent claim shall be awarded an amount not to exceed its compensatory damages. If the action was based on a claim of funds from the state Medicaid program, 10 percent of any remaining proceeds shall be deposited into the Operating Trust Fund to fund rewards for persons who report and provide information relating to Medicaid fraud pursuant to s. 409.9203. Any remaining proceeds, including civil penalties awarded under s. 68.082, shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund.
(4) Regardless of whether the department proceeds with the action, if the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of s. 68.082 upon which the action was brought, the court may, to the extent the court considers appropriate, reduce the share of the proceeds of the action that the person would otherwise receive under this section, taking into account the role of the person in advancing the case to litigation and any relevant circumstances pertaining to the violation. If the person bringing the action is convicted of criminal conduct arising from his or her role in the violation of s. 68.082, the person shall be dismissed from the civil action and shall not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. Such dismissal shall not prejudice the right of the department to continue the action.
68.086 Expenses; attorney fees and costs.
(1) If the department initiates an action under this act or assumes control of an action brought by a person under this act, the department shall be awarded its reasonable attorney fees, expenses, and costs.
(2) If the department does not proceed with an action under this act and the person bringing the action conducts the action, the court may award to the defendant its reasonable attorney fees and expenses if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim of the person bringing the action was clearly frivolous, clearly vexatious, or brought primarily for purposes of harassment.
(3) No liability shall be incurred by the state or the department for any expenses, attorney fees, or other costs incurred by any person in bringing or defending an action under this act.
68.087 Exemptions to civil actions.
(1) No court shall have jurisdiction over an action brought under this act against a member of the Legislature, a member of the judiciary, or a senior executive branch official if the action is based on evidence or information known to the state government when the action was brought. For purposes of this subsection, the term “senior executive branch official” means any person employed in the executive branch of government holding a position in the Senior Management Service as defined in s. 110.402.
(2) In no event may a person bring an action under s. 68.083(2) based upon allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil action or an administrative proceeding in which the state is already a party.
(3) The court shall dismiss an action brought under this act unless opposed by the department, if substantially the same allegations or transactions as alleged in the action were publicly disclosed:
(a) In a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing in which the state is a party;
(b) In a legislative, administrative, inspector general, or other state report, hearing, audit, or investigation; or
(c) From the news media,
unless the action is brought by the department or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information. For purposes of this subsection, the term “original source” means an individual who, before a public disclosure under this subsection, has voluntarily disclosed to the department the information on which allegations or transactions in a claim are based, or who has knowledge that is independent of and materially adds to the publicly disclosed allegations or transactions and has voluntarily provided the information to the department before filing an action under this section.
[This section contains the government knowledge bar. If the state already knows about the fraud or if the fraud is in the news media, no reward! That is why it is important to be the first to file, If you have knowledge of fraud against the government or involving government funds, don’t delay!]
(4) No court shall have jurisdiction over an action where the person bringing the action under s. 68.083(2) is:
(a) Acting as an attorney for state government; or
(b) An employee or former employee of state government, and the action is based, in whole or in part, upon information obtained in the course or scope of government employment.
[If you are a state employee, you probably don’t qualify for a whistleblower reward.]
(5) No court shall have jurisdiction over an action where the person bringing the action under s. 68.083(2) obtained the information from an employee or former employee of state government who was not acting in the course or scope of government employment.
(6) No court shall have jurisdiction over an action brought under this act against any county or municipality.
68.088 Protection for participating employees.
Any employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by his or her employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of the employee or others in furtherance of an action under this act, including investigation for initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in an action filed or to be filed under this act, shall have a cause of action under s. 112.3187.
[Florida whistleblowers who suffer retaliation have important protections. There may also be protections under other laws including the federal False Claims Act and Dodd Frank.]
68.089 Limitation of actions; effect of interventions by department.
(1) A civil action under this act may not be brought:
(a) More than 6 years after the date on which the violation of s. 68.082 is committed; or
(b) More than 3 years after the date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been known by the department, but in no event more than 10 years after the date on which the violation is committed, whichever occurs last.
(2) If the department elects to intervene and proceed with an action brought under s. 68.083(2), the department may file its own complaint or amend the complaint of a person who has brought an action under s. 68.083(2) to clarify or add detail to the claims in which the department is intervening and to add any additional claims with respect to which the department contends it is entitled to relief. For statute of limitations purposes, any such pleading shall relate back to the filing date of the complaint of the person who originally brought the action, to the extent that the claim of the state arises out of the conduct, transactions, or occurrences set forth, or attempted to be set forth, in the prior complaint of that person. This subsection applies to any actions under s. 68.083(2) pending on or filed after July 1, 2013.
[The time period to file a Florida whistleblower complaint is complex and ranges between 3 and 6 years.]
68.09 Burden of proof.
(1) In any action brought under this act, the department or the qui tam plaintiff shall be required to prove all essential elements of the cause of action, including damages, by a preponderance of the evidence.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the state or the Federal Government in any criminal proceeding concerning the conduct of the defendant that forms the basis for a civil cause of action under this act, whether upon a verdict after trial or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, shall estop the defendant in any action by the department pursuant to this act as to all matters as to which such judgment or decree would be an estoppel as if the department had been a party in the criminal proceeding.
68.091 Construction and severability of provisions.
(1) This act shall be liberally construed to effectuate its remedial and deterrent purposes.
(2) If any provision of this act or its application to any particular person or circumstance is held invalid, that provision or its application is severable and does not affect the validity of other provisions or applications of this act.
68.092 Deposit of recovered moneys.
All moneys recovered by the Chief Financial Officer as head of the Department of Financial Services under s. 68.086(1) in any civil action for violation of the Florida False Claims Act shall be deposited in the Administrative Trust Fund of the Department of Financial Services.